|

September
2001
Return
Path Switching
The
PDF version of this document is available
Today's
cable operators are facing pressure to "clean up" the 5-42 MHz return
band to provision this spectrum for planned upstream services, such
as High Speed Data (HSD) and IP Telephony. Once the nodes are conditioned
and the green light is given for deployment of these services, the
issue of maintaining network integrity becomes paramount. The onus
falls on the engineering group to find quicker, less disruptive
and more cost-effective tools to assist them in accomplishing this
goal.
The
problem is impairments, which can take several forms: Intermodulation
such as CPD, Impulse Noise, HAM, CB, Customer Equipment, etc. Any
one of these can interfere with, and result in, the loss of data
traffic, which is essential to maintain these new services. If the
source of the interference is extreme, it could spill into other
nodes at the combining network, causing large areas of the network
to fail.
Traditional
Methods: Time and Personnel Intensive & Intrusive
The
current method of identifying and locating ingress starts at the
headend. The technician, through a regular maintenance routine,
or a trouble ticket, checks each node looking for ingress. This
involves connecting an analyzer to one test point at a time and
translating the results. This process alone can take several hours,
depending on the number of nodes and travel time.
Once
ingress is identified and the need for repair is established, it
is referred to field technicians for resolution. Typically, the
procedure is to locate the source of the ingress by process of elimination.
Starting at the node, return pads are removed from each feeder leg
of the node until the ingress disappears. The ingress is then narrowed
to a distribution area. Next, traveling downstream from the node,
the technician proceeds to the next active device (line amplifier)
and repeats the process. It may require visits to two or three "actives"
before isolating the ingress to a single distribution segment.
As
each distribution segment can have up to four "actives" and 30 or
more passive devices (multitaps, couplers, splitters), this is the
most time-consuming part of the process. At this level, it is usually
a matter of removing components along the feeder (tap plates, coupler
boards) while disrupting both power and RF downstream.
A
number of problems can be identified with this scenario:
- It
is time-consuming. Using this methodology, it takes at least
two hours at the headend to confirm a problem exists and several
hours or even days in the field isolating the ingress.
- It
is disruptive. Existing CATV and HSD customers will be without
their services while cable company technicians are locating ingress.
- It
is reactive. The cable company is reacting to a situation
that may already be causing problems to customers.
- It
is low-tech. This technology does not respond well in meeting
customer needs associated with return path applications, such
as data transmission over cable.
Return
Path Switching
Return
path switching ("wink" switches) involves electronically segmenting
the entire cable plant into small pockets, with the express purpose
of quickly locating potentially destructive ingress and other impairments
in the return band. This process can be remotely managed, and the
results viewed from one, or possibly many locations. Return path
switching gives the technical staff the ability to quickly interrogate
any portion of the cable plant looking for ingress without being
disruptive to existing upstream or downstream services.
Node
Switching
The
first phase involves the coupling of an "intelligent" switching
device at the headend or hub site, with optical receiver test points.
This gives the operator, from a central location, "on-demand visibility"
into any node within the cable network. It also accommodates the
sharing of one analyzer over multiple node locations, thereby eliminating
the need for dedicated analyzers at each hub. Controlling the switches
with an intuitive software program, the operator can conduct strategic
searches of the system while viewing the results on a spectrum analyzer
display built into the application. This can facilitate the automating
of searches for suspect nodes and also provide 24/7 alarm conditions
to alert "on call" technicians to potential problems.
Typical
cable network layout

Field
Switching
To
get visibility beyond the node requires the installation of field
switching devices. The modules are in an environmental housing similar
to a line coupler, and are installed at strategic locations within
the node, starting at each coaxial output of the optical receiver,
then at each distribution amplifier and main line splits. The deeper
into the distribution network the modules are installed, the smaller
the pocket to isolate ingress.
Typical
placement of field switching modules in a cable network

To
locate the source of ingress using field modules, a 6 dB pad is
selectively switched in. Engineering tests have proven that this
switch is non-destructive and will not affect HSD services. In locations
where ingress is severe or where services are not yet deployed,
it is possible to momentarily shut down (terminate) the 5-42 MHz
band. The results of the field switching are displayed on a spectrum
analyzer for interpretation. When the ingress is reduced by 6 dB
or disappears (depending on the option selected), it is then a matter
of switching devices deeper into the plant in order to locate the
point of origin of the ingress.
Once
the ingress source is located within a certain distribution area,
technicians are dispatched to the site. In all cases, this process
of testing and locating is achieved from a single location, by one
person.
Return
Path Monitoring
Another
application for field switching is as an automated monitoring system
of the return path. This is a proactive approach to maintaining
the integrity of the network. After setting up alarm parameters
for each node, the Cable Ingress Management software will scan,
at a predetermined rate, all the nodes in the cable plant. Once
an alarm is triggered, it can set off escalation procedures based
on the significance of the ingress. This alarm condition can range
from a visual screen alarm to the paging of a technician.
If
a technician is paged, he calls in to the control software via modem
or LAN (TCP/IP) connection and interrogates the system for the cause
of the alarm. Post-alarm traces can be retrieved to determine the
actual type and severity of the ingress. Once in control of the
system, field modules are switched to determine exactly where in
the cable plant the ingress is originating.
At What
Price?
The
implementation of this type of system as described does involve
costs, but the operational savings in reducing the fault locating
time from hours to minutes without any disruption of paying services
are considerable. Technicians can, from one location, perform extensive
testing of the return path. The system is also scaleable: it can
be added to as needed, driving the locating of ingress deeper into
the distribution plant.
Of
equal importance is the fact that existing paying customers are
not adversely affected by the process. In the effort to clean up
the return path, the tearing apart of equipment to search for ingress
can be very disruptive to the "bread and butter" cable TV customer.
Traditional
methods of locating the source of ingress do work, but they are
very labor-intensive, technically frustrating and time-consuming.
The capital required to install intelligent switching devices within
the distribution network is quickly offset by the ability to be
able to hastily interrogate the network and isolate return path
problems before they affect customers.
A
clean, reliable return plant is the cable company's key to gaining
additional revenue streams from today's new applications.
The Solution:
Remote Return Path Switching
With
CLEARPath, today's cable network managers now have access,
at a reasonable cost, to a scaleable return path technology
that monitors and rapidly detects ingress beyond the node.
By
installing field-switching modules at strategic locations beyond
the fiber node, in the distribution plant, the operator is ready
to quickly locate the source of ingress between two modules. This
results in a proactive approach to managing ingress.
Traditional
vs Remote Switching Methods
|
|
Traditional
Methods |
Remote
Switching Methods |
|
Capital
Cost
|
Low
capital cost
|
Initial
capital cost
|
|
Operating
Cost
|
High
|
Low
|
|
Problem
Resolution
|
Slow
and disruptive
|
Fast
and non-intrusive
|
Issues
of time, cost and flexibility are clearly paramount from the moment
network managers begin to use their return path: there is now a
clear and urgent need for the right technology to meet the exploding
requirements generated by today's applications, especially data
communications.
Fortunately,
specialized equipment is now available to replace traditional methods
of cable ingress troubleshooting, which addresses the growing requirements
for maintaining a reliable cable network.
Contact
information:
Electroline's
Sales & Marketing Department:
Email: Use our Online Information
Request Form
Tel.: (514) 374-6335 (Toll-free: 1-800-461-3344)
Fax: (514) 374-9370
8265 St-Michel Blvd.
Montréal, QC, Canada, H1Z 3E4
Addressable
Products
- Return Path Products
- Amplifiers - Line Passives
|